Florida Atlantic
University
Division of Research and Graduate Studies
Veterinary Services
Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs)
Section C - Occupational Health
Table of Contents
1 Personal hygiene (06/04)
2
Occupational Health and Safety Program (06/04)
2.D Administrative
Procedures (06/04)
2.E Facility
Design and Operation (06/04)
2.F Exposure Control (06/04)
2.G Education and Training (06/04)
2.H Occupational Health-Care Services (06/04)
2.H.d Federal Recommendations for Occupational Health-Care Services for Research
Programs That Involve Experimentally or Naturally Infected Vertebrate
Animals(06/04)
2.H.e Assessment of Risk Associated with
Animal-Related Research
(06/04)
(06/04)
2.H.i Activities of an Occupational Health-Care
Service
(06/04)
2.H.j Identification of Persons at High Risk
(06/04)
2.H.k Interaction with Environmental Health and
Safety Staff
(06/04)
2.H.l Pre-placement (Pre-assignment) Medical
Evaluations (06/04)
2.H.m Periodic Health Evaluations (06/04)
2.H.m.iii Episodic Health Evaluations (06/04)
2.H.m.iv Recognition, Evaluation, Recording, and
Follow up of Adverse Health Outcomes (06/04)
2.H.m.v Medical Management of Worker-Compensation
Cases (06/04)
2.H.m.vi Immunization (06/04)
2.H.m.vii Medical Recordkeeping (06/04)
2.H.m.viii Serum-Banking Sect. (06/04)
2.H.m.ix Exit Evaluations Sect. (06/04)
2.H.m.x Non-occupational Health Care (06/04)
2.H.n Program Evaluation (06/04)
2.H.n.iii Equipment Performance (06/04)
2.H.n.iv Information Management
(06/04)
2.H.n.iv.2 Occupational Health and Safety
Information-Management
(06/04)
2.H.o Emergency Procedures (06/04)
2.H.p Program Evaluation (06/04)
2.H.q Specific procedures for VS personnel (06/04)
3 Biohazard control (06/04)
4 Special Considerations
(06/04)
4.A Facilities and Procedures for Animal Research with
Hazardous Agents (06/04)
5 Table for
Suggested Physical Examination (06/04)
Handout (06/04)
Occupational Health
A.
REFERENCE
a.
Laboratory Animal Welfare Act, as amended by the Animal Welfare Act of
1985, 1989, 1990, 1991 7USC 2131 et seq
b.
Animal Welfare Regulations, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 9, Parts
1, 2 and 3
c.
"Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals", DHEW Publication No.
(NIH) 86-23, 1996
d.
"Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals", OPRR (NIH), 1986
e.
“Occupational Health and Safety in the Care and Use of Research Animals”,
NRC, 1997
f.
“Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories”, CDC/NIH, 4th
ed., 1999
B.
PURPOSE
a.
The purpose of this is to provide a standard operating procedure (SOP)
for the people working with Laboratory Animals. Deviations from this procedure
require approval by the University Veterinarian except in emergencies, when any
appropriate action may be taken to protect animals and personnel.
C.
APPLICABILITY
a.
This SOP applies to all personnel involved in the handling and care of
Laboratory Animals used for biomedical research or teaching at the Florida
Atlantic University.
D.
SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
a.
Laboratory Animals can be carriers of zoonotic diseases. Caretakers are
encouraged to wear proper attire which includes gloves and work uniform. On
occasions, Laboratory Animals will bite or scratch which could lead to injuries.
E.
PROCEDURES
A.
It is the purpose of this policy to protect the public, the staff, and
the laboratory animals from incidental exposure to communicable and zoonotic
diseases.
B.
It is essential that the animal care and investigative staffs maintain a
high standard of personal cleanliness. Facilities and supplies for meeting this
obligation are provided. Clothing suitable for use in the animal facility is
supplied and will be laundered by the animal facility. Personnel should change
clothing often enough to maintain personal hygiene. Outer garments worn in
animal rooms are not intended to be worn outside the animal facility. No work
clothes are to go home.
C.
Personnel must change into supplied clothing prior to working in the
animal facility, and must remove supplied clothing prior to leaving the animal
facility building (the only exception to the removal of clothing is made when
personnel are on authorized business between campus animal facilities). Animal
facility personnel are authorized up to ten minutes at the beginning and end of
each work shift for changing clothing. At lunch, individuals are authorized 10
minutes at the beginning and end of the lunch period for changing clothes.
D.
It is highly recommended that animal care personnel avail themselves of
the shower facilities prior to leaving work. This is especially important for
individuals who live with someone who is pregnant, aged, ill, or otherwise
susceptible to disease.
E.
Hand washing is an important part of personal hygiene, both to prevent
"hand-to-mouth" transmission and to prevent the spread of disease between groups
of animals.
F.
Personnel are not permitted to eat, drink, smoke, or apply cosmetics in
the animal facility or when animals are present except in locker rooms and
designated break areas (no smoking anywhere per University policy)
G.
Allergies can be fatal. Personnel have to be aware at all times that the
dander or hair they may have on them could be fatal to someone. Wear clothes to
use with animals and then change prior to going out of the facility especially
into a café or elevator.
A.
Federal requirements and guidelines for Occupational Health and Safety
Programs include Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Public
Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National
Institute of Health (NIH) Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA
Molecules, and Animal Welfare Act. Also, recommendations are included in the
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and Biosafety in
Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories.
B.
The program involves the University, IACUC, Veterinary Services,
Environmental Health and Safety, and the Departments that use animals.
C.
The program has nine key elements to it.
a.
Administrative Procedures
b.
Facility Design and Operation
c.
Exposure Control
d.
Education and Training
e.
Occupational Health-Care Services
f.
Equipment Performance
g.
Information Management
h.
Emergency Procedures
i.
Program Evaluation
a.
Administrative procedures are carried out by the IACUC in their approval
process for protocols and programs.
i.Prior to the approval of
an animal use protocol, the committee has to review and approve the animal use.
ii.The committee evaluates
and assures that all risks are evaluated and approved by the corresponding
hazard committee. i.e. Infectious agents, recombinant-DNA molecules that are not
exempt from federal guidelines, hazardous chemicals, radiation, or the use of
animals that present unique hazards.
b.
Along with the IACUC, the Office of Veterinary Services (VS) performs
administrative functions in the training of personnel, tracking diseases and
other risks, etc.
c.
Principal Investigator has the responsibility to submit with his/her
protocol all pertinent information associated with any hazard including hazards
to other personnel and animals.
a.
Facility design is based on
i.Species to be maintained
ii.Type of research
1.
Consideration is given to space requirements associated with confining
and limiting hazards, collection of hazards and their storage, etc.
b.
Special consideration is given to the ventilation system, space
arrangement and layout, support areas, traffic patterns, and access to utilities
and mechanical areas.
c.
Consideration is made concerning the prevention and control of ergonomic
hazards.
i.Physical stress in
repetitive operations
ii.Lifting and movement
d.
Equipment design and layout
a.
Exposure controls include engineering controls, work practices, and the
use of personal protective equipment
i.Engineering controls.
1.
This control includes the use of "barriers", special equipment such as
hoods with exhausts systems, down draft necropsy tables, one time pass air,
filter tops for cages, HEPA filtered air, etc. to separate animals from human
exposure.
ii.Work practices.
iii.Limit exposure by using
restricted areas, time of exposure, etc.
iv.Proper education of
personnel.
v.Proper procedures to reduce
direct and indirect exposure
1.
Handling and Transport of Animals
A.
Use proper protective measures appropriate for the hazard as outlined in
the protocol. Should include hazards to other animals, people handling or
transporting the animals and other personnel that might come in contact with the
animals, either directly or through aerosol methods.
2.
Personal hygiene
A.
No eating, drinking, smoking or applying cosmetics in an animal facility
(with or without animals present) or when animals are present (such as in a
laboratory).
3.
Housekeeping
A.
All areas that involve animals will be maintained clean and neat.
B.
Work surfaces should be disinfected before and after use each day. Floors
should be disinfected at least once a week or more often if appropriate.
a.
Dust should be considered a factor in cleaning. Only "wet" cleaning or
HEPA filter vacuums should be used to suppress dust.
C.
Waste disposal
a.
In cooperation with Environmental Health and Safety, all waste will be
appropriately disposed on a regular basis as appropriate for the material.
4.
Restraint of animals
A.
All precautions should be used in the handling of animals.
B.
Only experienced/trained personnel should handle them.
C.
Appropriate mechanical or pharmaceutical devices/agents should be used
when appropriate to avoid hazards for the animal and personnel. (Note. Some
pharmaceutical agents can be hazardous in themselves.)
5.
Cleaning cages
A.
Many hazards are associated with cage cleaning. Among them are bites from
animals, escape of animals, sharps, crushing injury, lifting injury, noise,
steam, slippery floors, electrical, improper disposal of waste, etc.
6.
Personal protective equipment
A.
All personnel handling animals or working around them should wear
appropriate gloves.
B.
All caretakers will be provided work uniforms to be worn in the facility.
a.
In certain areas such as within a barrier, the work uniforms will be
sterilized or disposal type.
C.
A minimum of clean lab coats provided by the University will be worn by
all personnel working with or around animals.
a.
Special hazards require a higher level of protection. This will be stated
on the door as is approved in the protocol.
D.
Under no circumstances should clothing worn with and working around
animals be worn outside the area where animals are kept nor should they be taken
home to be cleaned.
E.
Other protection devices that will be required as determined by
Environmental Health and Safety, VS, physician, etc. will be provided by the
University and the personnel will be encouraged to use it. This would include
allowing time for donning and proper removal of the protective devices. Besides
the suits, lab coats and gloves, protective gear would include special gloves,
respirator masks, disposal booties, special shoes, hearing and eye protection,
etc.
F.
All areas used by personnel working with animals should be identified by
Environmental Health and Safety and VS for their potential hazards and provide
proper equipment and education.
G.
Education and Training
a.
Administratively, all training will be recorded by VS that involves
animals, their use, and the environment associated with the animals. Other
departments may keep records for specific training as appropriate such as
Environmental Health and Safety and Radiation Safety.
b.
All personnel working with animals, in an animal environment, on a
protocol, or others as deemed appropriate will take the General Training Course
located on the VS web. (www.fauvet.fau.edu)
i.Additional special
training is provided as On-The-Job (OJT) training. Records are kept by VS for
the caretakers. Principal Investigators are to ensure all personnel on their
protocol are properly OJT trained.
1.
All caretakers, after completing the General Training Course and meeting
with the veterinarian for a discussion, will start a check-list of assigned task
training (OJT).
2.
A task list will be created by the Facility Manager of all tasks expected
of the caretakers
A.
Each item will be taught/discussed and then signed off by both the
teacher and the trainee and dated.
ii.Films, slides, and special
training are provided by the veterinarians and/or the veterinarian technician
upon request.
iii.From time to time,
additional special training will be conducted.
1.
Outside consultants such as detergent specialist, fire marshals, EH&S,
radiation safety, pest control specialist, crematorium specialist,
investigators, etc. will be asked to conduct training.
H.
Occupational Health-Care Services
a.
Occupational Health Program identifies hazards associated with animal
use, their tissues and the environment in which employees work. The main goal is
prevention. The second goal is early care. Both of these are provided through
the Occupation Health Program which includes physicians, nurses, assistants,
etc. All are part of the Occupational Health Program Committee who work together
to provide a safe place to work.
b.
The amount of protection required is based on many factors; time with
animals is only one. At the University, the factors are greatly reduced with the
absence of non-human primates. Most of the animals used do not carry a zoonotic
disease.
i. The Occupational Health
Program involves all personnel who work daily with animals including laboratory
animal technicians (Veterinary Services), managers, supervisors, veterinarians,
etc. The program also includes research technicians, Principal Investigators and
others who have contact with animals. It also includes visitors, students, and
anyone who works with animal products, chemicals, radiation, biohazards, etc. in
relation to or with animals.
c.
Federal requirements are stated earlier.
|
Practice |
Recommendation |
|
Limiting access |
Employees who are
highly susceptible to infection with the agent under study or for whom
infection might be unusually hazardous should not work in areas where the
agent is handled or where vertebrate animals that are experimentally or
naturally infected with the agent are used and cared for. |
|
Collection and storage
of baseline serum samples |
Biosafety level 2:
When appropriate, considering the agents
handled (e.g., where there is substantial risk of occupationally acquired
infection with the agent under study and methods are available to measure
immunologic response to the agent). |
|
Biosafety level 3:
For all employees who have access to
areas where the agent under study is handled or where vertebrate animals
that are experimentally or naturally infected with the agent are used and
cared for and where methods are available to measure immunologic response to
the agent |
|
Serological
surveillance |
Periodic collection and
testing of serum samples for at-risk employees is recommended where there is
substantial risk of occupationally acquired infection with the agent under
study and methods are available to measure immunologic response to the
agent. Testing of the sample should be conducted at each collection and the
results communicated to the employee. |
|
Immunization |
Immunizations are
recommended for clearly identified at-risk employees where a safe and
effective vaccine or toxoid exists (e.g., vaccines against hepatitis B,
yellow fever, rabies, and poliomyelitis, and toxoids against diphtheria and
tetanus). Decisions for giving less-efficacious vaccines, those associated
with high rates of local or systemic reactions, or those which produce
increasingly severe reactions with repeated use should be carefully
considered. |
|
Screening tests |
Skin testing with
purified protein derivative (PPD) of previously skin-test-negative at-risk
employees is recommended. |
e.
Assessment of Risk Associated with
Animal-Related Research
|
Criterion |
Possible
Classifications |
Information Sources |
|
Exposure intensity |
High
Medium
Low
Absent |
Job profile,
environmental health and safety assessment, employee history |
|
Exposure frequency |
8 h/wk or more
Less than 8 h/wk
No direct contact
Never |
Job profile,
environmental health and safety assessment, employee history |
|
Hazards posed by
animals |
Severe illness
Moderate illness
Mild illness
Illness unlikely |
Institutional
veterinarian |
|
Hazards posed by
materials used in or with animals |
Severe illness
Moderate illness
Mild illness
Illness unlikely |
Material-safety data
sheets; CDC-NIH agent summary statements; radiation-, chemical, and
biological-safety committees; environmental health and safety staff |
|
Susceptibility of
employee |
Direct threat
Permanent increase
Temporary increase |
Medical evaluation,
review of personal medical records |
|
Expected incidence or
prevalence |
High
Medium
Low
Absent |
Published reports,
industry experience |
|
History of occupational
illness or injury in the position or workplace |
Severe
Moderate
Mild
None |
Worker-compensation
reports, OSHA 200 log |
|
Regulatory requirements |
Required for any
contact Professional judgment permitted |
Environmental health
and safety office, consultants. risk managers |
Source: CDC-NIH 1993
i.An occupational
health-care service has various important responsibilities:
ii.To commit to developing a
detailed knowledge of the occupational hazards of employees and an understanding
of the temporal and spatial distribution of those hazards. These are referred to
below as "that knowledge" and "that understanding."
iii.To understand the medical
presentation of occupational illness and injuries for which employees are at
risk.
iv.To understand the
characteristics of the workforce, the nature of sensitivity or susceptibility
factors among members of the workforce, and how these factors affect the ability
of employees to perform their tasks.
v.To apply that knowledge to
an understanding of how employment presents a direct threat to employees'
health.
vi.To communicate that
understanding to the health, safety, and management teams to assist them in
making program decisions that are based on the best available medical knowledge.
vii.To communicate that
understanding to potential and current employees so that they can decide whether
to accept potential hazards.
viii.To communicate the necessary
medical information in the event of an occupational illness or injury in a
timely fashion to persons with a need to know, including human-resources,
worker-compensation, health and safety, and supervisory personnel.
ix.To strive to maintain
objectivity in the face of conflicts that occur because of the occurrence of
work-related illness or injury.
x.To educate employees about
early warning signs of occupational illness or injury that should prompt medical
action or evaluation.
xi.To provide the institution
a considered judgment, based whenever possible on aggregate information, as to
the status of Occupation-related illness and injury among employees.
xii.To participate in the
identification of employees at high risk because of animal-related research.
g.
The effectiveness with which those responsibilities are carried out
depends on the health-care provider's knowledge of the employee health risks
associated with the care and use of research animals at the institution. It also
depends on the opportunity to foster genuine collaboration among all program
activities of the University that manage, support, and conduct the animal care
and use program.
h.
There is a major need for a basic, accessible body of knowledge about
health risks to employees. Health-care providers need to have appropriate
training and experience to establish and maintain an effective health-care
service as part of an occupational health and safety program for employees
involved in the care and use of research animals. The information needed to
conduct an occupational health program is typically acquired from many sources.
It is essential that veterinarians, investigators, and environmental health and
safety professionals participate in the orientation and continuing training of
health-care providers about zoonoses. exposures, illnesses, and other health
risks associated with the care and use of research animals. Infectious-disease
specialists, allergists, dermatologists, and pulmonologists might also have to
be consulted about aspects of employee health.
i.
Activities of an Occupational Health-Care Service
i.The selection of
occupational health-care services is based on knowledge of occupational hazards,
the nature of health risks associated with animal care and use activities at the
University, and the diversity of employees, the work environment, and the
mission of the University. An occupational health-care service that provides
comprehensive health-care services to all employees engaged in the care and use
of research animals without consideration of employee risks is expensive and
might not convey the understanding that employees must have to minimize
occupational-health risks. Greater value comes from occupational health-care
services that are selectively and judiciously based on work activities that
place employees at risk of occupational injury or illness. For example, a
preplacement medical evaluation usually consists of a review of functional
demands of a position, hazards associated with the animal species involved,
potential experimental hazards, and the employee's medical history. Such an
evaluation makes good sense if an employee is being assigned duties that require
heavy lifting, the handling, of animals that are known to be potential sources
of zoonotic infections, the cleaning of cages, or the handling of blood borne
pathogens. But it would not be prudent or cost-effective to perform preplacement
evaluations of employees only on the basis of substantial contact with research
animals, because resources would be directed where hazards do not exist.
ii.The occupational
health-care services can include preplacement medical evaluations, periodic
health evaluations, episodic health evaluations, analyses of adverse health
outcomes, medical management of worker-compensation cases, immunizations,
medical recordkeeping, serum-banking, exit evaluations, and non-occupational
health care. The value and relevance of those activities for employees at risk
are discussed in the sections that follow. No activity should be selected for
inclusion in a University's occupational health-care service without
consultation with environmental health and safety professionals (Environmental
Health and Safety) and discussion with representatives of the research and
animal care and use programs.
j.
Identification of Persons at High Risk
i.The University should
identify employees at risk because of animal-related research and determine who
should participate in the various activities provided by the health-care
service. Categories of employees whose activities should be reviewed are
investigators, technicians, animal-facility operators, clerical and other
support personnel, students, trainees, visitors, maintenance and housekeeping,
personnel, engineers, and facility-management technicians. The service
components that are needed vary with the nature and intensity of the risk.
k.
Interaction with Environmental Health and Safety Staff (Environmental
Health and Safety)
i.Interaction between
occupational health-care service staff and environmental health and safety staff
is necessary to develop, workplace-exposure information needed for health-care
services. Such interaction constitutes a process for alerting, environmental
health and safety professionals to hazards that might require additional
control. This interaction is also important for assessing risks associated with
activities related to animal research and helps to establish criteria for
selecting employees who will routinely receive health-care services.
l.
Preplacement (Preassignment) Medical Evaluations
i.The preplacement
evaluation serves several functions in the occupational health-care service.
Every employee who is identified to participate in various activities of the
health-care service and is subject to substantial risk in the animal care and
use program should undergo a preplacement medical evaluation. It establishes
baseline health information on employees before exposure to the risks associated
with animal-related research. Pre-existing conditions that can affect an
employee's capability to perform the essential functions of his or her position
without risk of substantial harm might be identified. Another function is to
discuss medical conditions that might alter an employee's exposure-risk profile;
these could include current conditions (such as tuberculosis) and possible
future conditions (Such as pregnancy in women of child-bearing age). Medical
conditions that could temporarily alter fitness for duty or require on-site
emergency treatment (such as diabetic hypoglycemia and epileptic seizures) can
be noted, and appropriate contingency plans can be made. The preplacement
medical evaluation also presents an opportunity for education about potential
hazards in the workplace, the need for accommodation or personal protection, and
medical symptoms that should prompt an employee to seek occupational-health
evaluation between routine visits.
m.
Periodic Health Evaluations
i.Scheduled, periodic health
evaluations are often a key component of occupational-health programs. They are
most useful when carefully designed to obtain information that can be used to
verify the success of the occupational health and safety program in reducing
occupational illness and injury. The components and frequency of evaluations
depend on the nature of potential hazards. Symptoms of health alterations that
are of insufficient severity to be labeled disease can prompt preventive
measures. Knowledgeable and experienced people, including representatives of
worker compensation, environmental health and safety, personnel (human
resources), and the occupational health-care service, should determine the need
for and design of periodic health evaluations. There should be a schedule for
the re-evaluation of previous decisions, the interval for which depends on
changes in exposure or workforce characteristics, injury and illness experience,
and the availability of new guidance regarding good occupational-health
practice.
ii.Physical examinations need
not be a routine part of periodic medical evaluations. Periodic workplace
physical examinations are typically performed on healthy persons and rarely
alter judgments about their fitness for duty. Resources can be better spent on
aggregating and analyzing health-status information. performing worksite tours,
and tailoring health programs to be specific to the circumstances of each
worksite. The time spent with an employee in a medical evaluation might be
better spent in taking a careful history based on a knowledge of worksite risks,
informing the employees of the nature of hazards and the means of protecting
against them, and warning signals of illness.
iii.Episodic Health Evaluations
1.
Persistent symptoms, symptoms that indicate the onset of a work-related
illness, or the occurrence of a work-related injury should prompt appropriate
medical evaluation and care. A physical examination focused on the chief
complaint is typically needed as a routine part of an episodic health
evaluation. The results of some evaluations (such as the finding of an eye
injury) are referred directly to specialists, and a mechanism is needed to make
the health-care service staff and the environmental health and safety staff also
aware of them. As a general rule, any event that leads to medical evaluation and
any loss of work that is thought to be work-related should be reported to the
occupational-health information system (BLS 1986).
iv.Recognition, Evaluation,
Recording, and Follow-up of Adverse Health Outcomes
1.
The incidence and prevalence of medical symptoms, injuries, or illnesses
should be assessed periodically. Several mechanisms are used to recognize
adverse health risks and adverse health outcomes. Incident reports are completed
when medical symptoms occur as the result of a workplace event or exposure. They
should be reviewed by the health-care service to determine whether medical
evaluation is needed; the information should also be reviewed by the
environmental health and safety staff to determine whether their involvement is
needed.
2.
"Near-miss reports" may be prepared by employees when equipment
malfunction or performance error almost results in an accident or substantial
exposure. Near-miss reports are usually kept by the environmental health and
safety staff but can be reviewed by health-care providers.
v.Medical Management of
Worker-Compensation Cases
1.
The management and treatment of worker-compensation cases by the
occupational health-care service might be an effective way to reduce incidence,
severity, and costs of occupational injuries and illnesses (McGrail and others
1995). This service can provide closer monitoring of an employee's ability to
return to work than an outside provider unfamiliar with the work setting.
Return-to-work examinations allow for review of injuries and illnesses
(work-related or personal) not being followed by the occupational health-care
service and can facilitate an appropriate and safe return to the worksite.
vi.Immunization
1.
Immunization programs are an accepted method of protecting people from
some infectious diseases. The decision to immunize an employee should be made
because of a clearly defined, recognized risk at the time of preplacement,
periodic, or episodic health evaluations (guidance for administration of
specific vaccines and toxoids, such as for hepatitis B, rabies, and tetanus, is
provided by the Public Health Service Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices (IPAC 1996).
vii.Medical Recordkeeping
1.
It is the responsibility of the University to maintain medical records
related to an employee's participation in a health-care service activity. The
responsibility may be delegated to a contract medical service, but there should
be a provision for transfer of records if the contractual arrangement
terminates.
2.
Aggregation of occupational-health data is commonly overlooked.
Preplacement and periodic health evaluations are performed on many workers, but
their results are seldom analyzed in the aggregate for informational purposes.
The information derived from aggregate data can be of great use in guiding
program decisions. Consultation with epidemiologists can be useful because they
understand how and why information should be aggregated.
viii.Serum-Banking
1.
Serum-banking is the collection and frozen storage of serum samples drawn
from employees who might be at risk for occupationally acquired infection.
Typically, the purpose of the program is to give the University the ability to
compare serum obtained after an acute illness or exposure with serum obtained
before the illness or exposure began, Although serum-banking has generally been
regarded as a standard component of occupational-health programs, it should be
conducted only when there is a clear reason for obtaining the specimens and
there is a plan to analyze the data as part of a risk-assessment strategy. CDC
and NIH (CDC-NIH 1993) recommend serum-banking- and serologic surveillance when
a substantial risk of occupational illness is associated with an agent under
study and methods are available to measure immunologic response to the agent
(see Table 7- 1 ).
A.
Currently, no known disease or condition nor species are present that
would warrant the storage of serum. If a disease or condition is identified,
then storage of serum would immediate began for those involved.
2.
Substantial issues should be considered in advance of instituting a
serum-banking program, including chain of custody, confidentiality,
identification and handling of samples, retention, potential deterioration of
sample quality over time and cost. The program should include informed consent
of employees and allow them to decline to participate. The collection and
storage of employee serum should not be performed in the absence of a
functioning occupational health and safety program.
ix.Exit Evaluations
1.
An exit evaluation is defined as a medical evaluation performed when an
employee terminates employment. Its purpose is to determine the employee's
health status when exposure to potential hazards ceases. Such an evaluation has
potential value for medical and legal reasons. As a practical matter, however,
few employees are interested in undergoing, evaluations when they leave an
employer; after the final paycheck has been disbursed; there are few incentives
for the employee to return. It is unlikely that information useful to an
occupational health and safety program will be obtained from exit interviews.
x.Nonoccupational Health Care
1.
The occupational health-care service should not be the source of primary
medical care for employees. Its use as such a source is discouraged because it
diverts resources from aspects of the program aimed at reducing workplace health
risks.
2.
Some employers choose to use the occupational health-care service for
general health promotion, such as blood-pressure measurement, cholesterol
screening, and education about healthy lifestyles. The enthusiasm for that kind
of promotion should be tempered by an honest assessment of the institution's
resources that are available for occupational health.
n.
Program Evaluation
i.Evaluation of the adequacy
of a health-care service should focus on whether the health-care providers meet
legal requirements and ethical guidelines, accomplish the mission of the
occupational-health program, recognize the essential elements of the health-care
service, and deliver the appropriate components of the service.
ii.The following conditions
are indicators that a program is adequate:
1.
Health-care providers tour the facility and are knowledgeable about the
workplace-hazard profile.
2.
The health-care service is aware of the occupational-health profiles of
employees as reflected in the worker-compensation claims experience, the 300
log, first-aid reports, and incident reports.
3.
Medical histories elicit risk-related events (such as the frequency and
severity of animal bites).
4.
The health-care service requests consultation from the environmental
health and safety staff in the case of health alterations or occupational
disease or injury.
5.
The health-care service participates in the development of activities of
the occupational health and safety program.
6.
The health-care service provides information to the institution about the
occurrence of work-related illnesses and injuries.
iii.Equipment Performance
1.
Environmental Health and Safety is responsible for programs for
certifying and monitoring equipment to ensure that it is capable of providing
the necessary protection and maintaining adequate performance.
2.
The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) publication will be used
for monitoring the ventilation in laboratories.
3.
All HEPA filters should be tested at least once a year.
4.
Ventilation system should be twice a year for proper amount of air flow,
one time pass air, and for pressures relative to other rooms.
5.
Autoclaves are to be tested regularly. All loads processed and tests
conducted will be recorded. Biological indicators will be used for the tests.
Where there is a print out of the temperatures, pressures and times, the print
outs will be added to the record of use.
6.
Fire inspection is conducted by the University.
iv.Information Management
1.
Record keeping is a multitask job performed by several units. VS has
primary responsibility for their personnel. Environmental Health and Safety will
maintain records of training they conduct. Radiation safety will maintain
records of their training. Researchers will maintain records of the people
associated with their protocol.
2.
Occupational Health and Safety Information-Management
|
Occupational Health and
Safety Information-Management |
|
Activity |
Information Provided by
Activity |
Information Received by
Activity |
|
Animal Care and Use |
Job profile
Project risk data
Training records |
List of employees at
risk
Employment risk indicators
Exposure and monitoring data
Health evaluation data
Health surveillance data
Health surveillance schedules
Material Safety data sheets
Risk assessment data
Training schedules |
|
Research |
Job profile Project
risk data
Training records |
List of employees at
risk
Employment risk indicators
Exposure and monitoring data
Health evaluation data
Health surveillance data
Health surveillance schedules
Material Safety data sheets
Risk assessment data
Training schedules |
|
Environmental Health
and Safety |
Accident and injury
investigation data
Employment risk indicators
Exposure and monitoring data
Material safety data sheets
Risk assessment data
Training schedules |
List of employees at
risk
Hazardous material purchasing data
Health evaluation data
Health surveillance data
Job classification and position descriptions
Job profile
OSHA 200 log data
Project risk data
Training schedules
Worker compensation data
Accident and injury investigation data |
|
Occupational Health |
Health evaluation data
Health surveillance information
Health surveillance schedules |
Accident and injury
investigation data
List of employees at risk
Employment risk indicators
Exposure and monitoring data
Job profile
Material safety data sheets
OSHA 200 log data
Risk assessment data
Worker compensation data |
|
Administration and
management |
List of employees at
risk
Hazardous materials purchasing data
Job classification and position descriptions
OSHA 200 log data
Worker compensation data |
Accident and injury
investigation data
Employment risk indicators
Job profile
Project risk data |
o.
Emergency Procedures
i.See SOP E
ii.Veterinary care is
provided 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Two veterinarians are employed full
time. Two other veterinarians working in non-veterinary jobs at the University
or as a local volunteer act as back-up in case of an emergency.
iii.Medical care for personnel
is provided 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. A medical center with full emergency
care is near the University.
iv.Emergency generators are
available at some facilities.
v.In all emergencies,
personnel are protected first, then animals and lastly the facilities.
p.
Program Evaluation
i.Monitoring of the program
is performed formally and informally by several units or organizations.
1.
USDA performs inspections on a regular basis.
2.
AAALAC accreditation is expected in summer of 2004
3.
IACUC performs at least semiannual inspections.
4.
VS continuously monitors elements of the program.
5.
Three areas of objective data are evaluated:
A.
The University's injury and illness experience
B.
The University's regulatory compliance performance
C.
Results of efforts to promote health and safety through continuing
interactions among major participants in the occupational health and safety
program.
D.
The data sources should include the results of exposure monitoring,
worker compensation records, OSHA recordable injuries and illnesses, results of
special health and safety studies or investigations, training records, minutes
and reports of the University health and safety committees and any related
actions taken by the IACUC, and results of inspections conducted by regulatory
agencies.
6.
Subjectively, the University should measure the effectiveness of
interactions among the major participants in the program is whether the health
and safety policies, rules and recommended practices are relevant to the hazards
that are present and can be implemented in a practical manner. (Relevance and
practicability influence altitudes and positive attitudes toward the
occupational health and safety program minimize risks.)
q.
Specific procedures for VS personnel
i.Caretaker personnel are
required to be scheduled by the Facility Manager
prior to starting work for
training and physicals
1.
Personnel who elect not to take the physicals or get the recommended
vaccinations, have to sign a waiver.
ii.The University
Veterinarian will keep the Occupational Physician apprised of all health related
situations in the facilities and with the VS personnel.
iii.Employees physicals
1.
Based on
A.
Species
B.
Contact time
C.
Amount of direct contact
D.
Special considerations such as biohazards, immunodeficient, etc.
2.
When/frequency/type of physicals
A.
Pre-employment
a.
Everyone requiring physicals for working with animals will get a
pre-employment physical (pre-animal contact, pre-hazardous procedure, etc., not
necessarily "pre-employment" at FAU.)
B.
Annual/Biennial
a.
At this time, all persons requiring physicals because of contact with
animals or hazardous experiments associated with animals will get at least
biennial physicals. Exceptions will be determined by the physician.
C.
Post-employment